large BCP38 compliance testing

Mon Oct 6 01:44:49 UTC 2014

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM,  <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
> The *real* problem isn't the testing.
> It's the assumption that you can actually *do* anything useful with this data.
> Name-n-shame probably won't get us far - and the way the US works, if there's a

At least "name and shame"  is something more useful than nothing done.

Ideally you would have transit providers and peering exchanges
placing "Must implement BCP38"  into their peering policy,   and then
they could use the data to help enforce their peering policies.

--
-JH