CDNs should pay eyeball networks, too.
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu
Tue May 1 21:24:23 UTC 2012
On Tue, 01 May 2012 17:16:38 -0400, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
> P.S. Bill, it is clear you have a point, but you are really stretching
> it. And it is not relevant to the discussion at hand.
Oh, I dunno. Double billing 2 customers for development and double billing
2 customers for transporting packets seem related ;)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120501/91e37966/attachment.sig>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list