shared address space... a reality!
alvarezp at alvarezp.ods.org
Fri Mar 16 13:01:58 CDT 2012
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:22:04 -0700, Christopher Morrow
<christopher.morrow at gmail.com> wrote:
> NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
> CIDR: 100.64.0.0/10
> NetName: SHARED-ADDRESS-SPACE-RFCTBD-IANA-RESERVED
Weren't we supposed to *solve* the end-to-end connectivity problem,
instead of just letting it live?
Sure, this lets CGN to be more organized for operators, but those that
already have RFC5735 addresses implemented will not switch to 100.64/10
just because there's a new block. Only new players will actually benefit
from this. It will only make it easier for new players to play in
IPv4 instead of being pushed to IPv6.
More information about the NANOG