Ipv6 for the content provider

Wed Jan 26 20:33:48 UTC 2011

On Jan 26, 2011, at 11:10 AM, David Freedman wrote:

>>> 
>>> 
>> And if your servers behind the LB aren't prepared for it, you lose a LOT
>> of logging data, geolocation capabilities, and some other things if you
>> go that route.
>> 
>> Owen
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> I can't imagine an LB vendor who would sell a v6 to v4 vip solution who
> wouldn't provide a way to inject the v6 addr in to the request as an
> additional header? I suggest a naming-and-shaming is in order
> 
Sure, but, if you're not prepared to parse, log, and deal with that header,
then, you lose, right?

Note I said "IF your servers behind the LB aren't prepared for it..."

Owen