quietly....

Jeremy jbaino at gmail.com
Tue Feb 1 04:31:43 UTC 2011


Has there been any discussion about allocating the Class E blocks? If this
doesn't count as "future use" what does? (Yes, I realize this doesn't *fix*
the problem here)

-Jeremy

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Jack Carrozzo <jack at crepinc.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > IPv4's not dead yet;  even the first  RIR exhaustion probable in  3 -
> > 6 months  doesn't end the IPv4 ride.
> >
> > There is some hope more IPv4 organizations will start thinking about
> > their plans for establishing connectivity with IPv6;  so they can
> > commmunicate with IPv6-only hosts that will begin to emerge
> > later.
> >
>
> What organizations (eye networks) will do is layer NAT till the cows come
> home for some years to come. Buckle up!
>
> -Jack Carrozzo
>



More information about the NANOG mailing list