UCEProtect Level 3

Thu May 7 20:29:19 UTC 2009

On Thu, 7 May 2009 16:21:26 -0400
Rich Kulawiec <rsk at gsp.org> wrote:
> (a) This discussion should probably be happening someplace other
> than NANOG (spam-l or mailop, perhaps?), and

True.  I didn't bring it up but this is my last post on the subject.

> (b) If you feel that UCEProtect L3 paints with too broad a brush,
> then you're certainly free not to use it.  I happen to agree with you
> on this particular level of this particular DNSBL for my particular
> applications, so I don't use it either.  However: I'm aware of other
> folks who are using it quite effectively as *part* of a scoring system.

I don't use it but my problem was that other ISPs whose clients were
trying to email my clients were using it.

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy at druid.net>         |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.