AT&T. Layer 6-8 needed.

Mon Jul 27 06:41:07 UTC 2009

This only protects ISPs from, upon being served notice, being liable for
content
A majority of the CDA was overturned, as it violates both first and fifth
amendments.  What is left of it only applies to ISPs PUBLISHING (*not*
filtering) content

This is Net Neutrality realm

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Andrew D Kirch <trelane at trelane.net> wrote:

> William Pitcock wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 23:15 -0700, Shon Elliott wrote:
> >
> >> Okay, so how do YOU block the attacks from eating up your bandwidth
> >> and filling
> >> up your logs without blocking the entire IP?
> >>
> >
> > If I was AT&T, I would purchase DDoS filtering equipment and run it at
> > edge where all of my traffic is peering anyway.
> >
> > This discussion is about AT&T, not you.
> >
> > William
> >
> While I agree, I certainly believe that due to the nature of some of the
> content
> on 4chan, AT&T can make a strong "Good Samaritan" claim under 47USC230.
> There's
> always TOR.
>
>
> Andrew D Kirch
>
>