larger space was: Re: [NIC-....
Paul Ferguson
pferguso at cisco.com
Thu Feb 15 21:09:49 UTC 1996
At 03:23 PM 2/15/96 -0500, Alan B. Clegg wrote:
>
>How exactly does a larger address space ease deployment of an ISP?
>"Current thinking" of who? Sure we should conserve space, but that was
>not my argument. My argument is that small ISPs are *NOT* going to
>cooperate to get larger blocks. They use any tactic to make themselves
>out to be 'larger fish' in that network bowl. Ever seen a nasty catfight
>between small local ISPs? I have. Not pretty. Cooperation? Not likely.
>
This is exactly the type of mentality that the address ownership
draft addresses, and without the word 'mandatory' appearing anywhere
in the text.
This attitude of non-cooperation is shameful.
- paul
More information about the NANOG
mailing list