<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/9/22 1:46 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAN9qwJ9meuYruFgnsWYLDV16iHEFsYkdtutgWeLU2y4kSR9JSg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">ISP here. Deploying gigabit FTTH. No IPv6.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Customers have 0 complaints about IPv6. 0 Complaints since
2006.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Do customers ever complain about double NAT's?</p>
<p>Mike<br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAN9qwJ9meuYruFgnsWYLDV16iHEFsYkdtutgWeLU2y4kSR9JSg@mail.gmail.com"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM
Grant Taylor via NANOG <<a href="mailto:nanog@nanog.org"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">nanog@nanog.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On
3/9/22 1:01 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:<br>
> It's not just equipment vendors, it's ISPs.<br>
<br>
I completely agree.<br>
<br>
I get why line of business applications; e.g. billing,
provisioning, <br>
repair, haven't been updated to support IPv6.<br>
<br>
But I believe that any network equipment vendor that is (or
has been for <br>
the last 1-2 decades) selling /new/ equipment really has no
excuse for <br>
not IPv6 not having feature parity with IPv4.<br>
<br>
> Here in Oregon, Frontier was recently acquired by Ziply.
They're doing <br>
> massive infrastructure work and recently started offering
symmetrical <br>
> gigabit FTTH. This is a brand new greenfield PON
deployment. No <br>
> IPv6. It took being transferred three times to reach a
person who <br>
> even knew what it was.<br>
<br>
I've had similar lack of success with my municipal GPON
provider. At <br>
least the people answering support tickets know what IPv6 is
and know <br>
that it's on their future list without even being in planing /
testing <br>
phase.<br>
<br>
> Likewise the Wave Broadband cable operator. No IPv6, no
plans for it.<br>
<br>
....<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Grant. . . .<br>
unix || die<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>