<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/4/22 2:03 PM, Matthew Petach
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEmG1=oTuYLR=cyN19yxZG+pK=Wi9BTV8s2NAFED2z7hNWFmkQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div dir="ltr"><br>
        </div>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 12:55
            PM Martin Hannigan <<a href="mailto:hannigan@gmail.com"
              moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">hannigan@gmail.com</a>>
            wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>I would argue they don't have much of a choice:</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>"The economic sanctions put in place as a result of
                  the invasion and the increasingly uncertain security
                  situation make it impossible for Cogent to continue to
                  provide you with service."</div>
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>I would expect to see others follow suit  if that
                  is the case.</div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>That's an interesting slope to slide along...</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>I fully understand ISPs disconnecting customers for
            non-payment; we've </div>
          <div>all had to do that at one point or another in our
            careers, I'm sure. </div>
          <div>However, that's generally done *after* the customer has
            demonstrated </div>
          <div>an inability or unwillingness to pay their bills.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>This doesn't seem to indicate that any existing invoices
            have gone </div>
          <div>unpaid past their due date, but simply that there is
            *concern* that a </div>
          <div>future bill might go unpaid due to the economic
            sanctions. </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>I'm not sure that's a good precedent for a service
            provider to create; </div>
          <div>"we may terminate your service at any point if we suspect
            that at an </div>
          <div>unspecified time in the future, you may become unable to
            pay future </div>
          <div>invoices." </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>Shades of Minority Report.  We'll imprison you today for
            a crime we </div>
          <div>suspect you will commit in the future.   ^_^;</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>If and when bills go unpaid, I fully support turning off
            customers. </div>
          <div>I worry about the precedent of disconnecting based on
            suspicions </div>
          <div>of what might happen in the future, however. </div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>With sanctions, isn't there a possibility that they literally
      *can't* get paid? That is, they are running on free service as of
      now?</p>
    <p>Mike<br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>