<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
<br class="">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On 6 Dec 2021, at 2:07 PM, Owen DeLong <<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com" class="">owen@delong.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<div class="">
<div class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">On Dec 5, 2021, at 9:03 AM, John Curran <<a href="mailto:jcurran@arin.net" class="">jcurran@arin.net</a>> wrote:<br class="">
<br class="">
Owen -<br class="">
<br class="">
The RSA and LRSA agreements are identical, however, it is true that you would lose legacy holder resource status (for those IPv4 resources issued to you before ARIN’s formation) if you consolidate to a single Org with one bill under the RSA.<br class="">
</blockquote>
<br class="">
I see no difference in the status of legacy holder resources vs. resources.<br class="">
<br class="">
I care not about that.<br class="">
<br class="">
However, there is (to some extent) a limit on how badly the board can elect to screw me financially year over year in the LRSA which simply does not exist in the RSA. To claim that an agreement which limits my fee increases year over year to $25 is identical
to an agreement which has no cap on fee increases is ludicrous at best, and certainly a bit disingenuous, if not worse.<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
<div>Owen - </div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<blockquote style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;" class="">
<div>If you value the $25 per year cap in fee change, then feel free maintain a separate LRSA for your legacy resource services. If you’d prefer to consolidate under a single RSA and pay a single fee based on the larger IPv4 or IPv6 category based on total
holdings in each, that’s also available to you – the choice is yours. If you choose to consolidate, then you will indeed have to pay the same fees as everyone else – even if a hypothecated future change to the fee schedule for that service category is greater
than $25 annual. If you consider paying the same fee as other ARIN customers for your legacy resource services to be a form of hardship, then maintain a separate LRSA agreement for them if you wish, </div>
</blockquote>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<blockquote style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;" class="">
<div>Back to the question raised in the original post: organizations that just have ARIN IPv4 number resources can obtain a corresponding-sized IPv6 block without increasing their registration services category and corresponding ARIN annual fee. </div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Please direct followups on ARIN fee structure back to the ARIN-ppml mailing list as this thread is wandering far afield from the issue raised by the original post. </div>
</blockquote>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div>/John</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>
<div>John Curran</div>
<div>President and CEO</div>
<div>American Registry for Internet Numbers</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<br class="">
</body>
</html>