<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">And ipv4 I presume so there is still easier and cost less money to just go with that. <div>From our point as an MSP no customer has a requirement that they want to be able to be reached via IPV6 so it’s still cheaper to buy up IPV4 address space and do a lot of nat than to convert all our services to function properly with IPV6. </div><div>Sure one could argue that they should have been made that way from the beginning but without customer demand why would we spend the money? <br><br><div dir="ltr">//Gustav </div><div id="AppleMailSignature" dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">23 okt. 2021 kl. 15:33 skrev Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 8:48 AM Bryan Fields <<a href="mailto:Bryan@bryanfields.net">Bryan@bryanfields.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">On 10/22/21 11:13 AM, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:<br>
> Another aspect that flabbergasts me anno 2021 is how there *still* are<br>
> BGP peering disputes between (more than two) major global internet service<br>
> providers in which IPv6 is 'held hostage' as part of slow commercial<br>
> negotiations. Surely end-to-end IPv6 connectivity should be a priority?<br>
<br>
Even the DNS root servers are not 100% reachable via IPv6. I would think IANA<br>
would have some standard about reachability for root operators.<br>
<br>
FWIW, I just was able to change my home office internet (I reside in the most<br>
densely populated county of Florida). The new provider sold me a dual stack<br>
connection, however when they came to deliver it, there was no IPv6 as<br>
promised. After spending almost a week playing phone tag, I finally got some<br>
one with clue. I was told they have no support if IPv6 and no plans to ever<br>
support IPv6 as there is no way to monetize it.<br>
<br>
This leaves me in the same position as my prior circuit via the local cable<br>
co. (no plans to offer IPv6) but at least it's faster than the 2 meg up cable<br>
service.<br>
<br>
Until IPv6 becomes provides a way to make money for the ISP, I don't see it<br>
being offered outside of the datacenter.</blockquote><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">87% of mobiles in the usa are ipv6</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div><a href="https://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/">https://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/</a></div><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)" dir="auto"><br>
-- <br>
Bryan Fields<br>
<br>
727-409-1194 - Voice<br>
<a href="http://bryanfields.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://bryanfields.net</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div></body></html>