<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>opening the link currently gives me a HTTP 500 error, very
      fitting :)<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 12.06.2021 um 04:42 schrieb Dan
      Mahoney:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:11AD8F0F-C961-449F-AAD8-3CEACA46685A@prime.gushi.org">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      I only just now found this thread, so I'm sorry I'm late to the
      party, but here, I put it on Medium.
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class=""><a
href="https://gushi.medium.com/the-worst-day-ever-at-my-day-job-beff7f4170aa"
          class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">https://gushi.medium.com/the-worst-day-ever-at-my-day-job-beff7f4170aa</a><br
          class="">
        <div class="">
          <div><br class="">
            <blockquote type="cite" class="">
              <div class="">On Mar 12, 2021, at 10:07 PM, Mark Tinka
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mark@tinka.africa"><mark@tinka.africa></a> wrote:</div>
              <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
              <div class="">
                <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
                  charset=UTF-8" class="">
                <div class=""> <font class="" face="Tahoma">Hardly
                    famous and not service-affecting in the end, but
                    figured I'd share an incident from our side that
                    occurred back in 2018.<br class="">
                    <br class="">
                    While commissioning a new node in our Metro-E
                    network, an IPv6 point-to-point address was
                    mis-typed. Instead of ending in /126, it ended in
                    /12. This happened in Johannesburg.<br class="">
                    <br class="">
                    We actually came across this by chance while
                    examining the IGP table of another router located in
                    Slough, and found an entry for 2c00::/12 floating
                    around. That definitely looked out of place, as we
                    never carry parent blocks in our IGP. <br class="">
                    <br class="">
                    Running the trace from Slough led us back to this
                    one Metro-E device in Jo'burg.<br class="">
                    <br class="">
                    It took everyone nearly an hour to figure out the
                    typo, because for all the laser focus we had on the
                    supposed link of the supposed box that was creating
                    this problem, we all overlooked the fact that the
                    /12 configured on the point-to-point link was
                    actually supposed to have been a /126.<br class="">
                    <br class="">
                    The reason this never caused a service problem was
                    because we do not redistribute our IGP into BGP (not
                    that anyone should). And even if we did, there are a
                    ton of filters and BGP communities on all devices to
                    ensure a route such as that would have never made it
                    out of our AS. <br class="">
                    <br class="">
                    Also, the IGP contains the most specific paths to
                    every node in our network, so the presence of the
                    2c00::/12 was mostly cosmetic. It would have never
                    been used for routing decisions.<br class="">
                    <br class="">
                    Mark.<br class="">
                  </font> </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <br class="">
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>