<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<font size="-1" face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
A take on the 1979 movie "When A Stranger Calls" - "have you
checked the children?" becomes "have you checked the IP
registration?"<br>
</font>
<p><font size="-1" face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><img
moz-do-not-send="false"
src="cid:part1.FCE626EA.D9B15A95@invaluement.com" alt="Have
you checked the IP registration?" width="480" height="360"></font></p>
<p><font size="-1" face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif"><br>
The vast majority of the time, Ron Guilmette does "the Lord's
work" - but THIS time - it looks to me like he put his political
biases ahead of legit anti-abuse, and it's no surprise that we
now have a trail of destruction left behind, along with much
"innocent bystander" collateral damage.<br>
<br>
Is DDoS-Guard without blame? Probably not, but them hosting some
occasional criminals is NOT UNLIKE EVERY OTHER GLOBAL NETWORK!
So like other large and diversity global networks, anti abuse
should focus on removing their worst criminals/spammers. By
these SAME standards, many other large and famous networks
should lose most or much of their IPs too!<br>
</font></p>
<p><font size="-1" face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">So here we
are, with many OTHER networks now legitimately freaked out about
losing their IPs, and with massive potential collateral damage
that might hurt many "innocent bystanders" each time that is
done!</font></p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72"><font size="-1" face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">--
Rob McEwen, invaluement
</font></pre>
</body>
</html>