<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">I would think as long as most of the LACNIC addresses are used in region they are fine. Without going and reading the policies in full, I would expect that there would be a exception for multinationals to allow them to get addresses from wherever they held a significant usage. <div><br><div dir="ltr">-- <div>Mark Andrews</div></div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 22 Jan 2021, at 22:09, Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"><div>Peace,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Jan 22, 2021, 12:27 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
The numbering resources under the stewardship of LACNIC must be distributed among organizations legally constituted within its service region [COBERTURA] and mainly *serving networks and services operating in this region. External clients connected directly to main infrastructure located in the region are allowed.<br>
<br>
*“Mainly” is understood to mean more than 50%.<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Just out of curiosity, I wonder what would happen if all the RIRs implemented the same policy. What if a company does business across the globe and any particular ICANN ASO region is only responsible e.g. of 40% of revenue at most?</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">--</div><div dir="auto">Töma</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div></body></html>