<div dir="ltr">Sounds like someone has more time to talk/type about political dogma with random strangers than the purpose of this mailing list.<div><br></div><div>- J</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:58 AM J. Hellenthal <<a href="mailto:jhellenthal@dataix.net">jhellenthal@dataix.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">Yeah he did the same dolt act to me to. Just a really bored dolt looking for nonsense with a crush on AOC.<br><br><div dir="ltr"><div><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)">-- </span></div><div><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"> J. Hellenthal</span></div><div><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)"><br></span></div><span style="background-color:rgba(255,255,255,0)">The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.</span></div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On Jan 19, 2021, at 00:40, Javier J <<a href="mailto:javier@advancedmachines.us" target="_blank">javier@advancedmachines.us</a>> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">you too, why are you emailing me?<div><br></div><div>I didn't ask anyone to contact me off list.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 8:53 PM Sam Silvester <<a href="mailto:sam.silvester@gmail.com" target="_blank">sam.silvester@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div dir="auto">Archives are browsable by anybody. How do you expect to keep political types out of the discussion?</div></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 at 11:36 am, Javier J <<a href="mailto:javier@advancedmachines.us" target="_blank">javier@advancedmachines.us</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">I couldn't agree more.<div>If I want to talk politics, I will go to other places. I use this mailing list to talk about things relevant to technology and operation of networks in North American and other places.</div></div><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>- Javier</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:19 PM Mel Beckman <<a href="mailto:mel@beckman.org" target="_blank">mel@beckman.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
javier,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I concur. What we don’t need on Nanog is outside parties deciding to “reign in” our discussions on political grounds!<br>
<br>
<div dir="ltr"> -mel beckman</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">On Jan 18, 2021, at 12:38 PM, Javier J <<a href="mailto:javier@advancedmachines.us" target="_blank">javier@advancedmachines.us</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">I agree 100%.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I know the emails on this list are public and that is fine. What I don't appreciate is that now my email address is in some politico's address list because of someone's behavior.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>- Javier</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:20 PM Jon Lewis <<a href="mailto:jlewis@lewis.org" target="_blank">jlewis@lewis.org</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
There's a world of difference between "don't expect list posts to be <br>
private to list members" and "don't forward the list to autoresponders."<br>
The stupidity of the latter, if it can be tracked down to who did it, <br>
should result in their removal from the list, at least until they explain <br>
what caused them to do that and have undone it.<br>
<br>
On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Paul Timmins wrote:<br>
<br>
> The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy.<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/</a><br>
><br>
> On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:<br>
>> Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what is the<br>
>> policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is "no sharing<br>
>> offlist" and then someone does, there are consequences for that someone.<br>
>> Anne<br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Anne P. Mitchell, Attorney at Law<br>
>> Dean of Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School<br>
>> Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal anti-spam law)<br>
>> Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange<br>
>> Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop<br>
>> Former Counsel: Mail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)<br>
>> <br>
><br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route<br>
StackPath, Sr. Neteng | therefore you are<br>
_________ <a href="http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">
http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp</a> for PGP public key_________<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div>