<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Sounds like you need a template based configuration management system and better automation more than you need to inflict an ad-hoc standardization of additional communities on the world.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Owen</div><div class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Sep 9, 2020, at 12:21 AM, Robert Raszuk via NANOG <<a href="mailto:nanog@nanog.org" class="">nanog@nanog.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="auto" class="">Mark,<div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">Nope .. it is the other way around.</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">It is all easy if you look from your network centric view.</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">But if I am connected to 10 ISPs in each POP I have to build 10 different egress policies, each embedding custom policy, teach NOC to understand it etc...</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">I think if there is a defined way to express prepend N times to my ISP peers across all uplinks or lower local pref in my ISP network in a same way to group of ISPs I see the value.</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="auto" class="">Best Regards,</div><div dir="auto" class="">R.</div><div dir="auto" class=""><br class=""></div></div><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Sep 9, 2020, 06:36 Mark Tinka via NANOG <<a href="mailto:nanog@nanog.org" class="">nanog@nanog.org</a>> wrote:<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<div class="">On 8/Sep/20 23:22, Douglas Fischer via
NANOG wrote:<br class="">
<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:courier new,monospace;font-size:small">Exactly Mike!<br class="">
<br class="">
The Idea would be to define some base levels, to make the
creations of route-filtering simpler to everyone in the world.<br class="">
And what comes beyond that, is in charge of each autonomous
system.<br class="">
<br class="">
It would make the scripting and templates easier and would
avoid fat-fingers.<br class="">
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
Are we saying that what individual operators design for their own
networks is "complicated", and that coalescing around a single "de
facto" standard would simplify that?<br class="">
<br class="">
Mark.<br class="">
</div>
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>