<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/Aug/20 17:45,
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:adamv0025@netconsultings.com">adamv0025@netconsultings.com</a> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:006e01d66a76$3b89a550$b29ceff0$@netconsultings.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Not
sure what you mean NFV is NFV, <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">From
NFV perspective cRDP is no different than vMX -it’s just a
virtualized router function nothing special…</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
What I meant that as we've been deploying NFV as a VM, cloud-native
means we take that VM and containerize it further. It's a further
diffusion of NFV, in my book. The benefits about the added
de-layering (if one can call it that) are left as an exercise to the
operator.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:006e01d66a76$3b89a550$b29ceff0$@netconsultings.com">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Also
with regards to NFV markets, it’s just CPE or telco-cloud
(routing on host, FWs, LBs and other domain specific network
devices like SBCs), and then RRs, no one sane would be
replacing high throughput aggregation points like PEs or
core nodes with NFV ,unless one wants to get into some
serious horizontal scaling ;).</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Well, vCPE's and vBNG's have long been the holy grail for some of
us, especially since it makes IPv6 roll-out significantly simpler.<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
</body>
</html>