<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/Aug/20 15:50, Ca By wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD6AjGS7FsJxrHep=4wmDk09f5nZ2oBvgSzAas-NQ-7naW2CNA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="auto">Aviation is regulated. <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Which is my point. While, like you, I am not in support in
heavy-handed regulation like most life & death industries
require, we also can't be leaving our industry open for any actor to
do as they please.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD6AjGS7FsJxrHep=4wmDk09f5nZ2oBvgSzAas-NQ-7naW2CNA@mail.gmail.com">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I am not normally supporting a heavy hand in
regulation, but i think it is fair to say Noction and
similar BGP optimizers are unsafe at any speed and the FTC
or similar should ban them in the USA. They harm consumers
and are a risk to national security / critical
infrastructure</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Noction and similar could have set basic
defaults (no-export, only create /25 bogus routes to limit
scope), but they have been clear that their greed to suck up
traffic does not benefit from these defaults and they wont
do it. </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Tar and feather them. FTC, do your job. </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">FTC has done good work before
<div><a
href="https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/01/ftc-charges-d-link-put-consumers-privacy-risk-due-inadequate"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/01/ftc-charges-d-link-put-consumers-privacy-risk-due-inadequate</a></div>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Noction — delete your account</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
+1.<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
</body>
</html>