<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/Jul/20 19:23, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
via NANOG wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:10865BB0-DDF9-4094-9D64-4ACD946B1C39@consulintel.es">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \(Cuerpo en alfa";
panose-1:2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EstiloCorreo18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
<div class="WordSection1"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">There was, long time ago, something developed
by ISC, but I think never completed and not updated …<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:12.0pt;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"
lang="EN-US">464XLAT is always a solution and becomes much
cheaper, than CGN from vendors, even if you need to replace
the CPEs. I’m doing that now with 25.000.000 subscribers …
(slowed down by the Covid-19).</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I have to agree... as "transition" tech. goes, 464XLAT is the least
intrusive solution, because as more of your customers acquire IPv6,
the demands you put on your 464XLAT systems reduce, naturally. It
also means you don't have to carry out yet-another transition to get
the full IPv6 experience.<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
</body>
</html>