<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Hello,</p>
    <p>  Taking advantage of this thread may I ask something?. I have
      heard of "wireless fiber optic", something like an antenna with a
      laser pointing from one building to the other, having said this I
      can assume this link with have lower RTT than a laser thru a fiber
      optic made of glass?</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Thanks,</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>Alejandro,<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/20/20 1:11 PM, Dave Cohen wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:A2F6342A-5DC1-4B4E-9E05-BBF8F877A7FE@gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      Doing some rough back of the napkin math, an ultra low-latency
      path from, say, the Westin to 1275 K in Seattle will be in the 59
      ms range. This is considerably longer than the I-90 driving
      distance would suggest because:<br>
      <div>- Best case optical distance is more like 5500 km, in part
        because the path actually will go Chicago-NJ-WDC and in part
        because a distance of 5000 km by right-of-way will be more like
        5500 km when you account for things like maintenance coils,
        in-building wiring, etc.</div>
      <div>- You’ll need (at least) three OEO regens on that distance,
        since there’s no value in spending 5x to deploy an optical
        system that wouldn’t need to (like the ones that would manage
        that distance subsea). This is in addition to ~60 in-line
        amplification nodes, although that adds significantly less
        latency even in aggregate</div>
      <div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Some of that is simply due to cost savings. In theory, you
          could probably spend a boatload of money to build a route that
          cuts off some of the distance inefficiency and gets you closer
          to 4500 km optical distance with minimal slack coil, and maybe
          no regens, so you get a real-world performance of 46 ms. But
          there are no algo trading sites of importance in DC, and for
          everybody else there’s not enough money in the difference
          between 46 and 59 ms for someone to go invest in that type of
          deployment. <br>
          <br>
          <div dir="ltr">Dave Cohen
            <div><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:craetdave@gmail.com">craetdave@gmail.com</a></div>
          </div>
          <div dir="ltr"><br>
            <blockquote type="cite">On Jun 20, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Tim
              Durack <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:tdurack@gmail.com"><tdurack@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <blockquote type="cite">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div dir="ltr">And of course in your more realistic
                example:
                <div><br>
                </div>
                <div>2742 miles = 4412 km ~ 44 ms optical rtt with no
                  OEO in the path</div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Jun 20, 2020
                  at 12:36 PM Tim Durack <<a
                    href="mailto:tdurack@gmail.com"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">tdurack@gmail.com</a>>
                  wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
                  0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                  rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                  <div dir="ltr">Speed of light in glass ~200 km/s
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>100 km rtt = 1ms</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Coast-to-coast ~6000 km ~60ms</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>Tim:></div>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">
                    <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Jun 20,
                      2020 at 12:27 PM William Herrin <<a
                        href="mailto:bill@herrin.us" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true">bill@herrin.us</a>>
                      wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
                      0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                      rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Howdy,<br>
                      <br>
                      Why is latency between the east and west coasts so
                      bad? Speed of light<br>
                      accounts for about 15ms each direction for a 30ms
                      round trip. Where<br>
                      does the other 30ms come from and why haven't we
                      gotten rid of it?<br>
                      <br>
                      c = 186,282 miles/second<br>
                      2742 miles from Seattle to Washington DC mainly
                      driving I-90<br>
                      <br>
                      2742/186282 ~= 0.015 seconds<br>
                      <br>
                      Thanks,<br>
                      Bill Herrin<br>
                      <br>
                      -- <br>
                      William Herrin<br>
                      <a href="mailto:bill@herrin.us" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true">bill@herrin.us</a><br>
                      <a href="https://bill.herrin.us/" rel="noreferrer"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://bill.herrin.us/</a><br>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  <br clear="all">
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  -- <br>
                  <div dir="ltr">Tim:></div>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <br clear="all">
              <div><br>
              </div>
              -- <br>
              <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">Tim:></div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>