<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/Jun/20 00:50, Warren Kumari
wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAHw9_iKBnHh-KV0N28kyQ6h-9r0xWLjbZLXtc-j+N-AyY0hhDw@mail.gmail.com">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">A number of customers (myself included) had 4
hour replacement contracts, which the vendor really could
not meet - so we agreed to take a new, much larger/better
model as a replacement.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
It's one of the reasons we never pay for 24/7/365.<br>
<br>
In many cases for our experience, with sufficient pre-built
redundancy, there isn't much different with 24/7 vs. NBD, apart from
the cost. So why pay for the premium.<br>
<br>
And if a site does not require redundancy, it's cheaper to have a
cold standby than to give it 24/7/365, or even NBD.<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
</body>
</html>