<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
We will take your path, lets wait 20 years for IPv6 to be fully deployed.<br>
</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of Brielle <bruns@2mbit.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, May 13, 2020 9:16 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: RIPE NCC Executive Board election</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">On 5/13/2020 12:09 PM, Elad Cohen wrote:<br>
> -----<br>
> /There's a fundamental lack of understanding from people on why you can't<br>
> just 'bolt on' more addresses to IPv4. Data structures in memory,<br>
> software APIs and syscalls, hex notations, subnetting, route<br>
> determination and propigation with internet routing protocols like BGP,<br>
> hardware CAM, among many other things./<br>
> -----<br>
> All of it will be resolved with a software update, and BGP will be <br>
> updated to support IPv4+ with backward compatibility.<br>
<br>
<br>
You mean what everyone's already implemented with IPv6? A complete <br>
overhaul/replacement for IPv4, with all the changes already done and <br>
fully supported in most major software packages, servers, routers, and <br>
switches?<br>
<br>
Enlighten me on why you are so obsessed with re-implementing IPv6 as IPv4+?<br>
<br>
<br>
-<br>
> /I'm not here to do your homework. Its not my fault you lack the<br>
> understanding as to why people are openly mocking you here on your<br>
> 'inventions'./<br>
> -----<br>
> Nobody is "mocking" besides IPv6 fans that are against any solution <br>
> until IPv6 will be fully deployed which can take more 20 years from now.<br>
<br>
<br>
Yes, because the all powerful IPv6 cartel is working with the Lumber <br>
Cartel to stifle your 'inventions' for 'solving' the world's IP and spam <br>
problems.<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Brielle Bruns<br>
The Summit Open Source Development Group<br>
<a href="http://www.sosdg.org">http://www.sosdg.org</a> / <a href="http://www.ahbl.org">
http://www.ahbl.org</a><br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>