<div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Dec 30, 2019, 12:44 PM Job Snijders <<a href="mailto:job@ntt.net">job@ntt.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear all,<br>
<br>
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 04:06:24PM -0500, Christopher Morrow wrote:<br>
> If there are AS46844 folk listening around their eggnog ... it'd be<br>
> nice if you would stop leaking prefixes: <a href="https://imgur.com/a/Js0YvP2" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://imgur.com/a/Js0YvP2</a><br>
> <br>
> this from the current view at: <a href="https://bgp.he.net/AS15169#_graph6" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://bgp.he.net/AS15169#_graph6</a><br>
> <br>
> I believe at least: 2620:0:1000::/40<br>
> <br>
> was leaking around your noction filters.<br>
><br>
> It is also possible that AS11878 should check their in/out filtering<br>
> as well, since thats' the path I see in the <a href="http://he.net" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">he.net</a> data...<br>
> <br>
> thanks!<br>
> -chris<br>
> <br>
> it looks like this is a noction box doing some internal TE things and<br>
> leaking around filters...though normally that appears as a subnet, not<br>
> an exact route match, so perhaps not this time?<br>
<br>
Can anyone offer ground-truth confirmation that the Noction IRP software<br>
actually supports IPv6?<br>
<br>
Kind regards,<br>
<br>
Job<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">It does. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://www.noction.com/news/noction_irp_release_14_ipv6">https://www.noction.com/news/noction_irp_release_14_ipv6</a></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Ryan</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>