<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/Nov/19 19:39, Rod Beck wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:DM5PR1301MB2220E967A7D6E4C76E9FCF79E4720@DM5PR1301MB2220.namprd13.prod.outlook.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
A landing station is not typically carrier neutral and is not
designed to have a huge of excess space to accommodate third
parties. When I was at Hibernia Atlantic we would get from time
to time a disaster recovery client, but there was not a lot of
excess space available and so it was priced accordingly. It will
be a very poor choice for most potential clients.
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Agreed.<br>
<br>
In some of our markets where carrier-neutral facilities do not exist
next to our CLS's, we may still sell some space, until it runs out.
We wouldn't typically add anymore because, well, that's not our core
business.<br>
<br>
Where carrier-neutral data centres may exist, we encourage customers
to got there, even if they feel being at the CLS is better than
being at the data centre. Not a major drama since our Metro would
hit the data centre anyway.<br>
<br>
Otherwise, we're always encouraging data centre operators to build
facilities in our markets to take the obvious pent-up load.<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
</body>
</html>