<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<span>Mr. Ronald Guilmette<br>
</span>
<div><br>
</div>
<span>You are the only person that called us thieves and crooks without any proof and for that we will discuss in the lawsuit against you.</span><br>
</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg@tristatelogic.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, September 19, 2019 1:12 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> nanog@nanog.org <nanog@nanog.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Elad Cohen</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">In message <VI1PR1001MB12949BC32DA7D5770736BEF0D6890@VI1PR1001MB1294.EURPRD10.P<br>
ROD.OUTLOOK.COM>, Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:<br>
<br>
>Mr. Ronald Guilmette<br>
><br>
>Everything you did and you wrote in this forum until today, including mud-<br>
>slinging and slandering, including thieves and crooks, they are libel for all<br>
>intents and purposes with everything it implies, and this without to<br>
>display any proof.<br>
><br>
>We return and say, in our hands are all the agreements of the purchases that<br>
>we've purchased properly with our best money.<br>
<br>
Mr. Cohen,<br>
<br>
I'm sure that I speak for many when I say that we all very much look<br>
forward to seeing the unredacted copies of those alleged purchase<br>
agreements, whenever you can take time out from your busy schedule to<br>
produce them.<br>
<br>
It would also be helpful if you would include whatever additional documents,<br>
as may be necessary, to demonstrate convincingly that whoever you allegedly<br>
bought the blocks from came by them honestly, and not due to some earlier<br>
skulduggery, particularly the ones I have already mentioned, e.g. the<br>
168.198.0.0/16 block, the 139.44.0.0/16 block, the 165.25.0.0/16 block,<br>
and not least the Infoplan/SITA block, 196.16.0.0/14.<br>
<br>
>It is hinted from your tongue-lashing, that you are connected clearly with<br>
>Spamhaus and ARIN, that have an interest to receive the ranges, following<br>
>the increase of value of the ranges in the free market and the lack of them.<br>
<br>
Gosh darm it! You caught me! I'm really a stealth IP speculator. I didn't<br>
want it publicly known that I have been sitting all this time on an enormous<br>
stash of no fewer than two whole IPv4 addresses. I also didn't want it<br>
known that I am actually in league with Spamhaus, ARIN, Vladimir Putin,<br>
the Marx Brothers, Boris Johnson, Ricky Gervais, and oh yes, Beelzebub.<br>
But now that the cat is out of the bag, I might as well fess up. Yes,<br>
we have all been plotting together to steal your valuable stash of IPv4<br>
addresses, and in fact, Cogent is in on the plot too. I would have told<br>
you sooner, but I was busy eating children... with a nice chianti, of<br>
course.<br>
<br>
>All of this subject was transferred to our lawyers, due to the mudslinging<br>
>and slandering and the nicknames you wrote thieves and crooks in this forum<br>
>a libel suit against you will be filed with a high amount, of course that<br>
>all of the written proofs an agreements regarding the legal purchases that<br>
>we've made will be added to the libel suit.<br>
<br>
Is the official NANOG historian in the house?<br>
<br>
I just want to ruling on this. Am I the first and only person who has ever<br>
received a cartooney directly on the NANOG list?<br>
<br>
I just want to know if I can go ahead and contact the Guinness people, and<br>
get this unique feat recorded officially.<br>
<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
rfg<br>
</div>
</span></font></div>
</body>
</html>