<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/15/19 7:26 AM, Dovid Bender wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAM3TTh3+S-kF9zJCz1yGTFeSr0tz62peF-+1M6CmD4R3DoOvng@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">You have no idea how sad and true this is. </div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 10:16
AM Jon Lewis <<a href="mailto:jlewis@lewis.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">jlewis@lewis.org</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On
Wed, 15 May 2019, Mike Hammett wrote:<br>
<br>
> What is the most common platform people are using with
such limitations? How long ago was it deprecated?<br>
<br>
One network's deprecated router is another network's new
[bargain priced] <br>
core router. :)<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>This is very true. I picked up a nicely equipped juniper mx240 -
waayyyy overkill for my current operation - for far, far cheaper
than anything I could have otherwise afforded new. Absolutely
killer could not be happier, and J has won a convert. But, I find
this seems to be the thing - needing capacity/feature sets/etc
just to be able to stand still, but not having the revenue stream
to actually pay new for what these vendors want to charge for
their gear/licenses/etc. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Mike-<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>