<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>Eh... you'll find it hard to get that past me. I know hundreds of self-funded ISPs that don't have route table size issues.<br><br><div><span name="x"></span><br><br>-----<br>Mike Hammett<br>Intelligent Computing Solutions<br>http://www.ics-il.com<br><br>Midwest-IX<br>http://www.midwest-ix.com<span name="x"></span><br></div><br><hr id="zwchr"><div style="color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>"Jon Lewis" <jlewis@lewis.org><br><b>To: </b>"Mike Hammett" <nanog@ics-il.net><br><b>Cc: </b>nanog@nanog.org<br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, May 15, 2019 9:14:57 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: BGP prefix filter list<br><br>On Wed, 15 May 2019, Mike Hammett wrote:<br><br>> What is the most common platform people are using with such limitations? How long ago was it deprecated?<br><br>One network's deprecated router is another network's new [bargain priced] <br>core router. :)<br><br>----------------------------------------------------------------------<br> Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route<br> | therefore you are<br>_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________<br></div><br></div></body></html>