<html><head><style>body{font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px}</style></head><body><div style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px">I have 4 QFX51xx switches in a virtual chassis and have no problems pushing that much traffic through them for several hundred servers with 10GB uplinks.</div> <br> <div class="gmail_signature"></div> <br><p class="airmail_on">On March 23, 2019 at 12:42:52 PM, Mehmet Akcin (<a href="mailto:mehmet@akcin.net">mehmet@akcin.net</a>) wrote:</p> <blockquote type="cite" class="clean_bq"><span><div><div></div><div>
<title></title>
<div dir="ltr">Hey there,
<div><br></div>
<div>I am trying to get my hands on some QFX5000s and I have a
rather quick question.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>In the past, I often used MX + EX where MX did routing
and I connected all uplinks/peering and EX, and EX did switching, i
connected my servers to ex.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>in QFX, I am trying to see if I need EX or not? more
importantly (besides from what juniper papers say) are there any
known issues people run into for a small scale deployment.
(100mbps-1gbps range 1 rack, 20 servers) </div>
<div><br></div>
<div>my plan is to have QFX to it all, but i am worried, if this is
too much for QFX, if you have relative experience on this , feel
free to let me know</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>thanks in advance</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>mehmet</div>
</div>
</div></div></span></blockquote></body></html>