<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/27/2019 8:31 PM, Daniel Rohan
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJXc8RLexvq9cK05-FtP0XyC+xp=trFnibbvZ2uD8izO05w3fw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">Can anyone shed light on how ISPs handle missing
samples when calculating p95s for monthly billing cycles? Do
they fill null samples with zeros or leave them as null? </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I’m working on a billing sanity tool and want to
make sure to cover my corner cases well. </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Thanks!</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Dan</div>
-- <br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">Thanks,
Dan</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<tt>You have to be careful legally. You can't bill something you
cannot prove. Unless you can extrapolate the data from the
adjacent samples, you have to assume the best case for the user
which is probably zero usage.</tt><br>
</body>
</html>