<div dir="ltr">NYC to LA is in the high 60ms range, so no, 200ms from Dallas to US west coast is not expected. <div><br></div><div><br><div><div><br></div></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:14 PM Mark Tinka <<a href="mailto:mark.tinka@seacom.mu">mark.tinka@seacom.mu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail-m_-6569336057219309858moz-cite-prefix">On 31/Jan/19 18:53, Mike Hammett wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="font-size:10pt">It's 180 ms from Dallas to
Djibouti, so no, that much latency to the west coast of the
US is not normal.</span></font><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Or from Gaborone to
Frankfurt, which is some 184ms.<br>
<br>
Short of long re-route paths or congested, high packet loss links,
I'd not expect the latency between any 2 points in the U.S. to hit
200ms.<br>
<br>
Mark.</font><br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>