<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
I know of none that take probabilities as inputs. Traditional network simulators, such as GNS3, let you model various failure modes, but probability seems squishy enough that I don’t see how it can be accurate, and thus helpful. It’s like that Dilbert cartoon
where the pointy haired boss asks for a schedule of all future unplanned outages :)
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="https://dilbert.com/strip/1997-01-29">https://dilbert.com/strip/1997-01-29</a><br>
<br>
<div dir="ltr"> -mel</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
On Jan 15, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Vanbever Laurent <<a href="mailto:lvanbever@ethz.ch">lvanbever@ethz.ch</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><span></span><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>I took the survey. It’s short and sweet — well done!</span><br>
</blockquote>
<span></span><br>
<span>Thanks a lot, Mel! Highly appreciated!</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>I do have a question. You ask "Are there any good?” Any good what?</span><br>
</blockquote>
<span></span><br>
<span>I just meant whether existing network analysis tools were any good (or good enough) at reasoning about probabilistic behaviors that people care about (if any).</span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span>All the best,</span><br>
<span>Laurent</span><br>
<span></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>