<html><head><style type='text/css'>p { margin: 0; }</style></head><body><div style='font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000'>Seems like a good reason to not use Firefox.<br><br><div><span name="x"></span><br><br>-----<br>Mike Hammett<br>Intelligent Computing Solutions<br>http://www.ics-il.com<br><br>Midwest-IX<br>http://www.midwest-ix.com<span name="x"></span><br></div><br><hr id="zwchr"><div style="color:#000;font-weight:normal;font-style:normal;text-decoration:none;font-family:Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;"><b>From: </b>niels=nanog@bakker.net<br><b>To: </b>nanog@nanog.org<br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, September 26, 2018 6:34:44 AM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: CloudFlare D.N.S. Resolvers... (1.1.1.1 & 1.0.0.1)<br><br>* nanog@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Wed 26 Sep 2018, 13:14 CEST]:<br>>I recommend that eyeball networks don't run any external recursive <br>>server for optimal CDN performance. Yes, some CDNs support other <br>>methods, but not all. If not all do, then the requirement remains.<br><br>+1<br><br>https://blog.powerdns.com/2018/09/04/on-firefox-moving-dns-to-a-third-party/<br><br><br> -- Niels.<br></div><br></div></body></html>