<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); color: rgb(0, 0,
0); font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 16px;" text="#000000"
bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/Aug/18 15:49, Colton Conor wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMDdSzNu-JZAVwMfO0hd6+JXB_ce2nX5nE1t=2mpHf+NR5GOfA@mail.gmail.com"
style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(0, 153, 0) ! important;
border-right: 2px solid rgb(0, 153, 0) ! important; padding: 0px
15px; margin: 8px 2px; font-size: medium;">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">We are looking for a new network monitoring system.
Since there are so many operators on this list, I would like to
know which NMS do you use and why? Is there one that you really
like, and others that you hate?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>For free options (opensouce), LibreNMS and NetXMS come
highly recommended by many wireless ISPs on low budgets.
However, I am not sure the commercial options available nor
their price points.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
We run Iris - home-grown (South Africa), great support, small/nimble
team that are able to fix issue, add features and give advice.<br>
<br>
Very flexible, captures plenty of data out-the-box, supports a ton
of vendors and data points, e.t.c.<br>
<br>
It's a commercial solution, but not out of reach. Heck, even I can
afford it :-).<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.irisns.com/">http://www.irisns.com/</a><br>
<br>
We moved from a Cacti/SmokePing/Observium/Zabbix combo to Iris 2
years ago. Much happiness.<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>