<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 09/09/2007, <b class="gmail_sendername">Andy Davidson</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br>On 9 Sep 2007, at 08:02, randal k wrote:<br>> This part here just boggles the mind. Not everybody out there that<br>> needs full routes is pushing enough bandwidth to justify the cost<br>> of a 720gbps backplane -- medium sized datacenters, regional ISPs,
<br>> etc all really like full routes but may never see even 30gbps of<br>> traffic. Everybody I've talked to about this particular problem has<br>> the same feelings -- that big C is hanging their 6509 user base out
<br>> to dry.<br><br>There are Vendor C platforms that can push much more than 30Gbit, and<br>take a full table comfortably, that cost a lot less than 6500 series<br>kit.<br></blockquote></div><br>That sounds very nice, what box is that ?
<br clear="all">I can't remeber our C rep mentioning anything about that, but in C's defense<br>I'm not always paying attention.<br><br>-- <br>Tony Sarendal - <a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com
</a><br>IP/Unix<br> -= The scorpion replied,<br> "I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-