
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Per Heldal <heldal@eml.cc> wrote:

>Regulation targeting software-vendors and service-providers has little
>effect as it is an attempt to disrupt the money-flow somewhere in the
>middle. It's usually more efficient to "attack" the source. I.e.
>authorities must hold computer users responsible and make them pay every
>penny (or millions;) it costs to investigate and clean up their mess.
>Mainstream OS'es as we know them would have been unsellable in today's
>market if users, ever since the internet was commercialised, had been
>held responsible. 
>

When the banks & merchants get sick & tired of underwriting the
fraud investigation and coverage liabilities, I think we will
begin to see more of an effort to put more of the liability in the
user's lap.

In fact, I think we are already starting to see some movement
in the fringes regarding this.

The only thing I can say about this is: be careful what you ask for.

The issues that might result as fall-out might be uglier than what
we have now. :-/

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.1 (Build 1012)

wj8DBQFGcxuCq1pz9mNUZTMRAqmVAJwPwjgyLxKzlNqwbRZgXUk2uD4aywCdH+CQ
MQJd8B/HGuhDFhCSN4K0K0M=
=3NdK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


