
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 26 May 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
>>
>> I would urge potential sponsors to insist that V6 is on the agenda as
>> a condition of funding, both meeting sponsors and Beer 'N Gear.
>
>it is possible that vendors might not want that story told on their
>behalf... there are still a significant number of vendors without any
>story for v6 :( (without a reasonable story I'd say)
>

For what it's worth, I won't be at the next NANOG -- it falls at the
same time as MAAWG, and I already had planned to be there to give
an invited technical presentation. I will try to be at the next one
in Albuquerque, though...

Having said that, I would be interested to hear the NANOG community
input on two particular topics:

[1] The results of the "Report from the IAB Workshop on Routing
and Addressing", and it's effect on IPv6 multihoming on the Internet
routing system, and;
[2] Vince Fuller's statistics that he has presented several times
in several different venues.


[1] http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~lixia/draft-iab-raws-report.txt
[2]
http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/routingandaddressing/vaf-iab-raws.pdf

I think before people start rushing off to deploy v6, there are
some serious issues that need to be addressed, regardless of v4
resource exhaustion.

- - ferg

p.s. If there are newer versions of the above two documents available,
mea culpa -- these should at least illustrate my point...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.1 (Build 1012)

wj8DBQFGWODaq1pz9mNUZTMRAsl2AKDmQEMlDsfhio4fQ9hPEbiafTSmhwCfSm0i
hk/MlzMHFJj/FS090gVGpE4=
=aOC6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


