
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- "Chris L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@verizonbusiness.com> wrote:

>So, I think that what we (security folks) want is probably not to
>auto-squish domains in the TLD because of NS's moving about at some rate
>other than 'normal' but to be able to ask for a quick takedown of said
>domain, yes? I don't think we'll be able to reduce false positive rates
>low enough to be acceptable with an 'auto-squish' method :(

Hi Chris,

While I agree with you, there are many of us who know that these
fast-flux hosts are malicious due to malware & malicious traffic
analysis...

I completely agree with you, however, on the issue of making
assumptions that it will always be malicious -- of course, that
will not always be the case. :-)

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.1 (Build 1012)

wj8DBQFGUd/7q1pz9mNUZTMRAigSAKDgooaGUsp+GT0sEYcEOivjY0afFwCfWmk6
EaWuXUl9W+3+uQEAEJ1c1SQ=
=V6Mu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


