
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net> wrote:

>Gadi Evron wrote:
>> 
>> Amen. Really.
>> 
>> I'd honestly like more ideas.
>
>What did IETF and ICANN say when you approached them through their 
public-comment channels?
>

The IETF does not deal with registry policy issues.

ICANN, from what I can tell, had this issue (doamin tasting) on their
agenda as a discussion iten in Lisbon last week, but i am unaware of
the discussion outcome.

Having said that, if this particular policy issue can be measured
by ICANN's proclivity with other domain policy issues, I think we're
talking years here. And that's kind of sobering, from a policy
perspective.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214)

wj8DBQFGDtf3q1pz9mNUZTMRAvgoAKCRgrGta2dtbGCLowMMtJf4htwGqwCg3BXm
nw7SEgMDEvMU3F4w8801Yos=
=IPRQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


