
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org> wrote:

>On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 16:47 -0500, Frank Bulk wrote:
>> For some operations or situations 24 hours would be too long a time to
>> wait. There would need to be some mechanism where the delay could be
>> bypassed. 
>
>What operation requires a new domain be published within 24 hours?  Even
>banks require several days before honoring checks as protection against
>fraud.  A slight delay allows preemptive enforcement measures.  It seems
>most if not all operations could factor in this delay into their
planning.
>

Doug and I completely agree on this issue.

So again, I ask: When does a policy breakdown become an operational
issue?

I would posit that it does when criminals are able to abuse the
system.

Would love to arguments to the contrary.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214)

wj8DBQFGDvB3q1pz9mNUZTMRAo1VAJ9rOisFN1xm4PjJsqUOeuSIWjy+OwCgpLQm
gU76B10LtNBWYrE9/JjiQ+U=
=vxKU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


