
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey, Danny:

- -- Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> wrote:

>While I understand your frustration, lest we not forget, providers  
are in
>the business of making money, and solutions of this type today only add
>to churn, additional operational expense and liability.  It's not  
quite so
>black and white as you make it, unfortunately.

Unfortunately, if ISPs don't do _something_ to "clean up their
own backyards", I hate to think of what the alternative may be.

>With that, as Sean points out, providers are trying to address the  
issues
>in an business-savvy manner and some do seem to have reasonable (IMO)
>solutions underway.  But be careful what you ask for, some of these
>solutions you're mandating might very well resemble SiteFinder-style
>schema's (or far worse) in order to justify the investment by the  
>providers.

Indeed.

It's a hairy problem, but an important one that needs to be
addressed.

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)

wj8DBQFF16eOq1pz9mNUZTMRAhNYAKCSmQieIM8K44H4AnRWcWbXVwax8wCglsF6
BMb6JC95v5IrtIH2x+MYMw0=
=T5dQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


