
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -- Peter Corlett <abuse@cabal.org.uk> wrote:

>On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 04:09:48AM +0000, Fergie wrote:
>> ...on the list who might be able to comment on how they/you/BT is
>> detecting downstream clients that are bot-infected, and how exactly you
>> are dealing with them?
>
>Which bit of BT? They've got their fingers in quite a lot of pies, and the
>Clue level varies wildly.
>
>Although given you've asked that question, I suspect that you're enquiring
>about their retail Internet offerings, and my impression is that they
>don't bother to check for or deal with infected hosts.
>

Well, thanks for the response :-) but I am looking for anyone who
could shed some light on this statement:

"BT has launched an automated system to identify professional
spammers and 'botnet'-infected customers on the BT broadband
network."

ref:
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/101306-bt-fires-back-at.html

I am curious as to what they're actually doing.

Cheers,

- - ferg

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.2 (Build 4075)

wj8DBQFFtPjSq1pz9mNUZTMRAnziAJ0dur37zDjC5ji7r+LKz8GwP7w8UgCg8dqH
omyWrRvl4I1WffMdZegUEEY=
=3jjq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg(at)netzero.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


