<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<big>Chris,<br>
<br>
The first item they need is a Network Engineer.<br>
<br>
You do not have actual IP addresses for servers you have DNS entries.
In my non legal opinion the individual filling suit is out money
because of there lack of understanding of DNS entries versus IP
addresses. You can resolve thousands of web sites to one IP address if
you want to or get another block of IP addresses from ARIN and resolve
the other addresses to the newly assigned addresses. It appears from
the filing that they do not understand how DNS works since with an
appropriately designed zone structure there would be no issues.<br>
<br>
This lawsuit is about the stupidity of the plaintiff and not about IP
address management. If any organization owns the IP addresses it is the
registries and they only lease them out to organizations for a nominal
fee to provide order and security for the Internet. ICANN for other
issues and ARIN for addresses bend over backwards to have large ISPs
and multinationals go through the same short process as any other
requester of IP addresses and have only one policy. And if you have
ever attended an ARIN meeting point out of the 100 to several hundred
high opinionated individuals who attend which ones control it for their
own economic benefit.<br>
<br>
Send this legal team a copy of Comer's books on TCP/IP and Cricket
Liu's book on DNS and BIND. I take the Comer books back they would not
understand them so give them Uyless Black's books they are more
clueless friendly.<br>
<br>
John (ISDN) Lee<br>
<br>
<br>
</big><br>
Chris Jester wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid52403.72.199.242.75.1157705170.squirrel@support.splitinfinity.com">
<pre wrap="">
I am looking for anyone who has input on possibly the largest case
regarding internet numbering ever. This lawsuit may change the way
IP's are governed and adminstered. Comments on or off list please.
Anyone have experiences like are said in the lawsuit? I would love
to know if this is true or not. Anyone with negative ARIN experiences
that relate to the lawsuit, please let me know, thanks!
For thos interested, you may read this lawsuit here:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:44uxmnEmJVkJ:www.internetgovernance.org/pdf/kremen.pdf+Kremen+Vs+ARIN&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1">http://72.14.209.104/search?q=cache:44uxmnEmJVkJ:www.internetgovernance.org/pdf/kremen.pdf+Kremen+Vs+ARIN&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=1</a>
Or google for Kremen VS Arin
Chris Jester
Suavemente, INC.
SplitInfinity Networks
619-227-8845
AIM: NJesterIII
ICQ: 64791506
Chris Jester
Suavemente, INC.
SplitInfinity Networks
619-227-8845
AIM: NJesterIII
ICQ: 64791506
NOTICE - This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
are only for the use of the person to whom they are addressed. If you are
not the intended recipient you have received this e-mail in error. Any use,
dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying or dealing in any way
whatsoever with this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this e-mail in error, please reply immediately by way of advice to us. It is
the addressee/recipient duty to virus scan and otherwise test the
information provided before loading onto any computer system. Suavemente,
INC.
does not warrant that the information is free of a virus or any other defect
or error. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Suavemente, INC.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>