
My personal opinion is that _some_ bitnet issues are indeed
relevant to the NANOG list, but that's just me. :-)

I mean, it _does_ affect network ops at times...

- ferg



-- Thomas Kuehling <thomas.kuehling@packetloss.biz> wrote:
Dear Fergie,

On So, 2006-08-13 at 21:49 +0000, Fergie wrote:
> For what it's worth, there _is_ a botnet discussison list:
> 
> General information about the mailing list is at:
> 
>  http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets

thanks, didn't know about it. But isn't it still usefull, when urgent
matters concerning botnets will still discussed on the nanog-list?
Please let me disabussed to it, but it's just my opinion.

Regards
Thomas

> - ferg
> 
> 
> -- Thomas Kuehling <thomas.kuehling@packetloss.biz> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> On So, 2006-08-13 at 15:17 -0600, Danny McPherson wrote:
> 
> > Interestingly enough, I lurk here 99.999% of the time. I comment
> > on this thread and folks ask to move it to a non-SP mailing list?   
> > Perhaps
> > non-operational, but this certainly has direct implications on SPs and
> > I'm of the opinion it's quite relevant - well, certainly as relevant  
> > as the
> > past recent threads:
> 
> i waited to view, where this discussion will go, but that's exactly the
> point. In my opinion, it's really interesting and necessary to be
> informed about topics like botnets. It would be a failure, when this
> topics won't be discussed anylonger on this list. Also it isn't that a
> big problem, to filter topics for himself for relevance or of no
> relevance.
> 
> Just my two cents.
> 
> Regards
> Thomas Kuehling
> 
> 
> --
> Thomas Kuehling - TK2325-RIPE
> Hoehestrasse 28 - 61348 Bad Homburg vor der Höhe - Hessen
> Jahnstrasse 6 - 26219 Boesel - Niedersachsen
> 
> --
> "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
>  Engineering Architecture for the Internet
>  fergdawg(at)netzero.net
>  ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


