
I take issue with what you folks think is relative.

It's _clearly_ unbalanced, unfair, and biased.

I'm in the process of turning back up a major portion of the
state network over the next couple of days hete in texas, and
reports of network status is somehow not on-topic?

I'm thinking that NANOG is just completely FUBAR'd...

You guys can have your boys club.

As for the rest of the readership, I'm Sorry you are ending up
with a mailing list that is ruled by a select few, who have decided
that they wish to control the content of "operations".

What a damned shame.

Good bye,

- ferg


-- Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

paul,

begging the point of whether news about telco, not internet,
circuits and wireless is ot for nanog, i think all martin was
asking is a subject: tag for for your news posts, as he seems
to have a brain-dead mua (which is highly popular for some
reason) with very limited filtering capabilities.  i don't
think he meant it as a personal attack; i assume you would know
one if he did:-).

randy

--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
 Engineering Architecture for the Internet
 fergdawg@netzero.net or fergdawg@sbcglobal.net
 ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/


