puck not responding

Sat Mar 2 17:38:13 UTC 2024

On Sat, Mar 02, 2024 at 11:55:45AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> George Herbert <george.herbert at gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > If it wasn’t for how clunky they are with email sites, I’d suggest
> > moving to a cloud somewhere.  But …
> 
> I believe statistics point in favour of the single puck.nether.net
> host....
> 
> BTW, for anyone else taking advantage of the excellent secondary service
> provided by puck: You might want to update your AXFR ACLs.  It seems the
> IPv6 address has changed.
> 
> I must admit that such transfer failures go unnoticed due to the large
> volume of unwanted requests.  So I appreciate the extra effort sending
> an email warning when a zone i disabled.

	Yes, I'm notifying people now and have updated the FAQ/docs
page.  I also said there that I would notify people if the geography of
the machine changed and it has.

	I still need to get my upstreams to notify all their upstreams
to permit packets as there's one provider that does uRPF in the mix, so
I have blocked their routes for now.

> Thanks for running all these high quality services!

it's the sustained community efforts that have allowed technology to
improve to the point where auto-updates and many other things are
without trouble, sadly i had to do a bit of physical moving of things,
but the machine should now have a ~10g uplink and if I can find the
right 100g device that I'm happy with I'm in a better position to
update/upgrade it now compared to a week ago.

	- Jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.