RPKI unknown for superprefixes of existing ROA ?

Mon Oct 23 12:24:28 UTC 2023

.
On 23/10/2023 16:00, nanog-request at nanog.org wrote:
> Message: 19 Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 14:20:56 -0400 From: Amir Herzberg 
> <amir.lists at gmail.com>I agree that a good, sensible 
> defense would be to simply announce your entire address block, e.g., in 
> the example, your entire /22 (with a ROA to your ASN), and filter the 
> traffic to the unused prefixes. Basically, I guess, it means that the AS 
> 0 solution shouldn't be used, at least not usually. I wonder if anyone 
> is using it , in fact. It would be nice to know if someone has the data 
> handy.

https://console.rpki-client.org/AS0.html


-- 
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20231023/e5fabe4e/attachment.sig>