Congestion/latency-aware routing for MPLS?

Wed Oct 18 16:34:26 UTC 2023

>
> I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for.
>

I would agree.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:28 AM Saku Ytti <saku at ytti.fi> wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 17:39, Tom Beecher <beecher at beecher.cc> wrote:
>
> > Auto-bandwidth won't help here if the bandwidth reduction is 'silent' as
> stated in the first message. A 1G interface , as far as RSVP is concerned,
> is a 1G interface, even if radio interference across it means it's
> effectively a 500M link.
>
> Jason also explained the TWAMP + latency solution, which is an active
> solution and doesn't rely on operator or automatic bandwidth providing
> information, but network automatically measures latency and encodes
> this information in ISIS, allowing automatic traffic engineering for
> LSP to choose the lowest latency path.
> I believe Jason's proposal is exactly what OP is looking for.
>
> --
>   ++ytti
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20231018/e2b6b3aa/attachment.html>