maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

scott surfer at mauigateway.com
Thu Oct 12 23:39:42 UTC 2023


Crap, that was supposed to be private.

scott



On 10/12/23 11:29 PM, scott via NANOG wrote:
> 
> 
> UGH, you called me out and I have no defense.  I was thinking of our 
> non-NAT customers.
> 
> scott
> 
> On 10/12/23 11:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Oct 2023, at 08:31, scott <surfer at mauigateway.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/11/23 7:47 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>>> Virtually no home network on the planet has fully functional IPv4 
>>>> available to it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hawaiian Telcom customers have it.  No blocks at all.
>>
>> So they don’t use NAT?  The internet is a peer-to-peer network.  NAT 
>> breaks that.
>>
>> But I can’t reach IPv6 devices on the Internet from my IPv4 device 
>> without a transition box is no
>> different to I can’t reach IPv4 devices on the Internet from my IPv4 
>> device because PNAT *is* a
>> transition device.  It’s a bogus complaint and I’m calling it out.
>>
>>> scott
>>
> 


More information about the NANOG mailing list