maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?
scott
surfer at mauigateway.com
Thu Oct 12 23:39:42 UTC 2023
Crap, that was supposed to be private.
scott
On 10/12/23 11:29 PM, scott via NANOG wrote:
>
>
> UGH, you called me out and I have no defense. I was thinking of our
> non-NAT customers.
>
> scott
>
> On 10/12/23 11:20 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Oct 2023, at 08:31, scott <surfer at mauigateway.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/11/23 7:47 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>>> Virtually no home network on the planet has fully functional IPv4
>>>> available to it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hawaiian Telcom customers have it. No blocks at all.
>>
>> So they don’t use NAT? The internet is a peer-to-peer network. NAT
>> breaks that.
>>
>> But I can’t reach IPv6 devices on the Internet from my IPv4 device
>> without a transition box is no
>> different to I can’t reach IPv4 devices on the Internet from my IPv4
>> device because PNAT *is* a
>> transition device. It’s a bogus complaint and I’m calling it out.
>>
>>> scott
>>
>
More information about the NANOG
mailing list