Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms

Mike Hammett nanog at ics-il.net
Fri Oct 6 14:17:44 UTC 2023


Well, and that's kinda where I was going. 

I've used FS passive systems for years. FS has an active platform or two (that I understand, they just whitebox). Does it really do everyone one would need to do? How much of a step is it to get something more? 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 

----- Original Message -----

From: "David Bass" <davidbass570 at gmail.com> 
To: "Dave Bell" <me at geordish.org> 
Cc: nanog at nanog.org 
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 8:55:21 AM 
Subject: Re: Low to Mid Range DWDM Platforms 


On the same topic, anyone have experience with the stuff from fs.com ? 



On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 9:53 AM Dave Bell < me at geordish.org > wrote: 



Smartoptics? 


https://smartoptics.com/ 



Regards, 
Dave 


On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 14:43, Mark Tinka <mark at tinka.africa> wrote: 

<blockquote>


On 10/6/23 15:07, Mike Hammett wrote: 

> I've been using various forms of passive WDM for years. I have a couple different projects on my plate that require me to look at the next level of platform. 
> 
> In some projects, I'll be looking for needing to have someone long distances of glass without any electronics. Some spans could be over 60 miles. 
> 
> In some projects, I'll need to transport multiple 100-gig waves. 
> 
> What is the landscape like between basic passive and something like a 30 terabit Ciena? I know of multiple vendors in that space, but I like to learn more about what features I need and what features I don't need from somewhere other than the vendor's mouth. Obviously, the most reliability at the least cost as well. 

400G-ZR pluggables will get you 400Gbps on a p2p dark fibre over 80km - 
100km. So your main cost there will be routers that will support. 

The smallest DCI solution from the leading DWDM vendors is likely to be 
your cheapest option. Alternatively, if you are willing to look at the 
open market, you can find gear based on older CMOS (40nm, for example), 
which will now be EoL for any large scale optical network, but cost next 
to nothing for a start-up with considerable capacity value. 

There is a DWDM vendor that showed up on the scene back in 2008 or 
thereabouts. They were selling a very cheap, 1U box that had a different 
approach to DWDM from other vendors at the time. I, for the life of me, 
cannot remember their name - but I do know that Randy introduced them to 
me back then. Maybe he can remember :-). Not sure if they are still in 
business. 

Mark. 





</blockquote>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20231006/19cf1809/attachment.html>


More information about the NANOG mailing list